A review on double feature Pakistani Drama & Comedy theatre plays ‘Exclusive’ as one, ‘Yahudi Ki Larki’ and ‘Sher Khan Ka Makan’ (2017).

 

 

+ Crew

• Directed by Khalid Ahmed
• Written by Agha Hashr Kashmiri
• Set Design by Jamil Afridi
• Costume Management by Syeda Maha Ali & Pervaiz Iqbal
• Makeup & Hair Styling by Majid Hussain

 

 

+ Music / Chorus Team

1. Julien Qaiser played Harmonium
2. Babar Ali played Tablaa
3. Mahjabeen
4. Hammad Khan
5. Hani Taha
6. Asiya Alam
7. Faryal Noushad
8. Raheel Ahmed
9. Farhan Malik
10. Kaif Ghaznavi

 

 
+ Note
Choreography by Mohsin Babar while the Assistant Directed by Fraz Chottani

 

 
+ Full Cast (Yahudi Ki Larki)

1. Akbar Islam as Brutus
2. Nazar-ul-Hassan as Azira Yahudi
3. Marya Saad as Raheel
4. Fawad Khan as Markas
5. Kaif Ghaznavi as Desiya
6. Aamir Naqvi as Badshah
7. Samhan Ghazi as Sipahi #1
8. Mazhar Suleman as Sipahi #2
9. Ashfaq Ahmed as Darbari
10. Faryal Noushad as Junaa

 

 

+ Plot
A Roman prince gets arrested because the girl he loves and involved with is a Jew. Due to the fact that his lover does not share the same religion likewise, this is why he is severely punished especially the Jew girl and her religious father on the orders of Brutus. But what Brutus does not know is that the Jew girl’s father, Azira Yahudi knows Brutus’s deep-down secret and the whereabouts of his long lost loved one.

 

 

+ High Points
i – Nazar-ul-Hassan as Azira Yahudi played the ‘Key Figure’ role as an old, religious father of Jew girl. He gave the best performance from the team.

ii – Fawad Khan as Markas played the main supporting role as the Roman Prince in disguise of a Jew. He performed as well as the script demanded him to be. Other Honorable Mentions: Marya Saad.

iii – The set design was profoundest.

iv – The musical chores helped in uplifting the play’s interest.

v – Decent job in costumes design / management.

vi – The play’s light humor in boosting the significance of the actors’ performance.

vii – Major recognition goes to director, when performances by almost everyone is well placed.

 

+ Low Points
i – Regardless of the play’s fame, Yahudi Ki Larki would be considered as one of the weak plays that respected Khalid Ahmed has ever directed.

ii – Most of the characters were halfheartedly written and are easily forgettable.

iii – The first half of the play is tiresome to watch.

iv – In present times, the classic story seems dull and obsolete. Perhaps, modernizing the story a bit may have sort out this problem.

v – It was very hard to keep a straight face and watch with interest. Most of the times, I kept nodding off on consistent rhyming dialogues.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

+ Full Cast (Sher Khan Ka Makan)

1. Farhan Alam as Sher Khan
2. Naz as Fitna
3. Fraz Chottani as Ghafoor
4. Usman Mazhar as Sheeda Khan
5. Hani Taha as Sheeda Khan’s Wife
6. Hammad Khan as Bakshoo

 

 

+ Plot
A highly irritated husband Sher Khan who claims to be honest, ‘Man of Honor’ who fears no one… except for his wife. You see his wife; Wali has a high and quick temper which she often releases on her husband Sher Khan but sweet to others. In the neighborhood where husbands are usually attracted to each other’s wife unknowingly to one another. But what Sher Khan does not know is that his wife is already flirting with at least two other men for selfish means.

 

 

+ High Points
i – Farhan Alam as Sher Khan performed his role as the most exciting comical character. In most cases, Farhan usually outdid the role that is given to him. The audience loved, cheered for him whenever he appeared or made satirical references.

ii – Naz as Fitna played role of Sher Khan’s nagging wife with first-rate quality. Her realistic performances always win the audience’s hearts. Other Honorable Mentions: Rest of the team.

iii – Praise worthy work by the entire cast members of Sher Khan Ka Makan in playing their roles up to the mark.

iv – The makeup & hair styling did an adequate work to make the cast members’ appearance genuine.

v – The musical chores and vocals helped in gaining the play’s interest.

 

+ Low Points
i – Stereo type jokes and their characters throughout the play only shows how weak the writer really is.

ii – Almost every character kept talking to themselves (in substitute of voice over) to let audience know what he / she is thinking of.

iii – The play was way too short to be entertained by it.

 

+ Overall
Despite the fact it is a double feature play, Yahudi Ki Larki is occasionally moving, and suitably ambitious, still it doesn’t live up to its classic source material as Sher Khan Ka Makan did with its childish, silly humor which doesn’t come at the cost of the play’s core.

 

Rate: 2.75 out of 5 stars

 

A review on Pakistani Com-Drama theatre play, ‘Aarfy’ (2016), Written by Kamal Ahmed Rizvi and Directed by Akbar Islam.

 

 

+ Note

Originally it is a 1944 play ‘Harvey’ by the American playwright Mary Chase. Chase received the Pulitzer Prize for Drama for the work in 1945. It has been adapted for film and television several times, most notably in a 1950 film starring James Stewart.

 

 

+ Full Cast:

1. Akbar Islam as S. M. Ahmed
2. Naz as Atiya
3. Hamza Shykh as Dr. Ahsun
4. Aamir Naqvi as Irshad Sahib
5. Sehrish Qadeer as Erum
6. Faraz Shykh as Wali Muhammad
7. Zaman Abbasi as Driver
8. Samina Aman as Mrs. Bari / Mrs. Zulfi
9. Khalid Sherwani as Dr. Zulfi
10. Faryal Memon as Maryam

 

 

+ Plot

A grown-up man, S. M. Ahmed has an “Imaginary” friend named Aarfy — in the form of a 6″3-foot-tall invisible rabbit. Ahmed’s family and friends believe he is mad as he is the only the one who could see ‘Aarfy’… well, almost the only one.

 

 

+ High Points

i – Another DYNAMIC performance yet again by Naz as Atiya. Those plays are really hard to miss if one learns that she is also performing in them. Her realistic performances, has gain a strong fan following in the theatre audience. Naz is now officially in the zone of ‘Great Performers’.

ii – Akbar Islam as S. M. Ahmed played the lead role really well; bought fond memories of the classic comedy film ‘Harvey’ (1950). This is the first theatrical performance I have watched of Akbar Islam. Honorable Mentions: Aamir Naqvi.

iii – Sehrish Qadeer & Khalid Sherwani performances were mild yet a welcome to theatrical world.

iv – The set design and its props were suitable according to the main scenes.

v – Nice to see new faces in almost the entire cast.

vi – The play is closely based on the film ‘Harvey’ (1950).

vii – Some of the scenes were nicely directed.

 

 

+ Low Points

i – Although the play is closely based on the film but still this comic play was unable to make people laugh and enjoy as one expected from it. The jokes were there but with a huge gap in between. In most places, it seemed as if we were only watching a drama play instead of comedy. Agreed that the play had light comedy in their drama play but the problem is that the premise of the play could have made it even more interesting and humorous to watch. The rules for theatre plays (in storytelling) work differently as to the film / TV. Here the audience wants quick, hilarious jokes, comic punch lines / actions in able to enjoy themselves. If the jokes / good punch lines cannot be placed in certain scenes then those scenes should be interesting to watch. Otherwise you would lose audience attention and level of interest very quickly and easily.

ii – If Aamir Naqvi is given a ‘Pandit’ role, even then he would refuse to cut his hair.

iii – The young cast needs to make more effort and gain more experience before their performances can be labeled as good.

iv – There were several scenes in the play which could have been easily edited out. These scenes had no link with the main plot and had lack of interest to watch. Such as ‘Nurse & Doctor’ scenes, ‘Wali Muhammad & Maryam’ scenes, etc.

v – The chairs placement (close to each other) at Dr. Zullfi hospital looked unnatural.

vi – Some of the young cast voice was too low for the audience to hear them clearly and easily.

vii – Since the play was not really that interesting and its time length was longer than usual plays therefore by 2nd half many people from the audience left the auditorium.

viii – Atiya kept banging the wrong door although she saw several times that the doctor went in to the other one.

 

 

+ Overall

You may be impressed by the lead performances but still Aarfy would leave many disappointed as it seriously lacks good jokes and hilarious punch lines.

 

 

Rate: 2.75 out of 5 stars

 

A review on Pakistani Rom-Drama theatre play, ‘Ishq Aatish’ (2018).

 

+ Crew

• Costumes Design, Written & Directed by Damyanti Gosai
• Lighting by Masood Rehman
• Direction & Production Design by Danish Irshad Abro and Jahanzaib Qureshi

 

+ Note
Ishq Aatish is a story of two lovers who choose to burn in spite of societal resistances which is still considered a taboo to discuss in many parts of the world.

Similar stories, films been made where this play might have been inspired from. Still, it was a good decision taken by Damyanti. Plus, I’m pleased to see new faces in the cast line-up as well.

 

+ Full Cast

1. Rao M Shahwaiz as Shaman, Assistant #1
2. Rehan Nazim as Prince of Ferozistan
3. Imran Fatani as King
4. Aamir Naqvi as Adviser
5. Tehreem Shafiq as Princess of Unabistan
6. Arsal Khan as Assistant #2 and Villager #1
7. Kiran Siddiqui as Maid
8. Zulfiqar Ali Khan as Haroon Yarzouf (Drunker) and Assassin
9. Ansaar Mahar as Servant and Guard #1
10. Jahan Zaib Navi as Guard #2 and Villager #2

 

 + Plot
Prince of Ferozistan is to be wed off to Princess of Unabistan on the orders of the King and continue to have royal legacy through their traditional customs from generations to generations. But what King doesn’t know is that his son has already given his heart to someone else.

 

+ High Points
i – Kiran Siddiqui as Maid acted very hilarious, very natural… loved how she treated her character. Due to her brilliant performance, she made her scenes most interesting to watch.

ii – A new comer, Rao M Shahwaiz as Shaman plays a very realistic character, as close companion to the prince. He was the second most interesting character to watch. Rao has made sure that the audience would remember him for his memorable performance. Other Honorable Mentions: Aamir Naqvi and Rehan Nazim.

iii – The costume designing is praise worthy and suitable for the characters. And then, I couldn’t help and notice the color of costume given to the characters of Shaman and Assistant #2, played by Rao Shahwaiz and Arsal Khan. The pink color was chosen carefully as this is the color where their community & rights activists present in their movement. Good move.

 

+ Low Points
i – Oh dear, what happened with Imran Fatani’s performance? He played as one of the major characters of this play. There were a number of flaws to talk about. Such as, many times he was seen being stuck to what his line was? He didn’t look calm, felt nervous while dialogue-delivery. There were moments when his co-star was giving his line and he reacted too quickly. But he couldn’t give his line as his fellow star had to complete his sentence first. That look of waiting, was clearly shown on his face. His gestures as royal highness was sometimes over acting, didn’t gave natural reaction as other stars were doing with their performances. Sometimes, Imran’s accent was of Mugal-e-Azam’s time period and sometimes of current times. The director should conduct more rehearsals with Imran, see where he is making mistakes, pin point him and make sure it doesn’t happen again.

ii – I cannot say that I enjoyed the play, as it was slow and mind-numbing to be precise. The writer/director needs to come up with much more interesting sub plots and intriguing punch lines. This would keep the audience more engaged with the play without glancing towards their wrist watch.

iii – Its understandable there might be ‘Budget Issues’. But it would help in boosting the audience’s interest by coming up much better set design and inclusion with relevant props of the time period, the play is based on.

iv – Since there was no / hardly any sub plots, hence the play had lackluster of strong supporting characters. One hour and twenty minutes is more than enough for this play with such limited interesting characters. Its betterment for the play if it is re-written with inclusion of these mentioned missing elements.

v – It’s unfortunate that a technical error occurred during the play, regarding lighting. Being pitch darkness, the play came to a standstill for few seconds. Besides this, there were times where the main light should have been focused on certain characters and not on the background characters. Instead the audience witnessed the entire stage to be brightly lit.

vi – The time length should be decreased, from 80 minutes to 65 – 70 minutes maximum. Since the play was being held downstairs, at basement therefore its time length makes it even harder for the audience to watch with concentration.

 

+ Overall
A different, daring take as Ishq Aatish, which is interesting in terms of performances but still lacks majorly in its story depths, vital supporting characters and its secondary details.

 

Rate: 2.0 out of 5

 

A review on Shakespeare’s play, Pakistani War-Rom theatre play, ‘Anthony & Cleopatra’ (2016).

 

+ Crew

• Director is Vajdaan Shah
• Sound Designers are Ashraf Bhatti & Sarosh Baloch
• Assistant Director is Muntazir Mehdi
• Costumes Designers are Pervez Iqbal & Erum Bashir

 

 

+ Note

Many consider Shakespeare’s Cleopatra, whom Antony describes as having “Infinite Variety,” as one of the most complex and fully developed female characters in the playwright’s body of work.

 

+ Full Cast:

1) Tariq Raja as Mark Anthony

2) Kulsoom Aftab as Cleopatra

3) Ishtiaque-ur-Rasool Omar as Octavius Casesar

4) Shabana Hasan as Charmain

5) Shahjahan Narejo as Mardian

6) Aisha Iqbal as Octavia

7) Faraz Ali as Ventidius

8) Muhammad Zaman as Silius

9) Faizan Chawla as Agrippa

10) Farhan Alam as Domitius Enobarbus

11) Ibad Alam Sher as Scarus

12) Khalid Sherwani as Proculeis

13) Aamir Naqvi as Menas

14) Syed Muhammad Jamil as Lepidus

15) Kashif Hussain as Sextus Pompeis

16) Faisal Hayat as Maecenas

17) Mujtaba Rizvi as Alexas

18) Muntazir Mehdi as Lamprius

19) Ghulam Murtaza as Ambassador

 

 

+ Plot

After defeating Brutus and Cassius, following the assassination of Julius Caesar, Mark Anthony becomes one of the three rulers of the Roman Empire, together with Octavius Caesar and Lepidus. He is in love with Cleopatra, the Queen of Egypt and settles in Alexandria. However, Anthony is compelled to return to Rome once learning out the death of his former wife and leave Cleopatra behind who becomes furious rage of jealousy.

 

+ High Points

i – Kulsoom Aftab performed dazzlingly and lovely as Cleopatra. I don’t think any other actress from NAPA would have been as convincing or believable as Kulsoom was for the lead role of Cleopatra. She fully drowned herself in the character’s wants, thoughts as well as her body movements and gestures.

ii – One could see the passion, the love between Anthony and Cleopatra was deep. In a play like this where the title says ‘Anthony & Cleopatra’, a Shakespeare’s plays based on tragic love story, passionate love between the two lovers was a must that was perfectly shown on-stage. It shows the good mutual understanding between the actors and the director. Good Job!

iii – The perfect athletic body of Kashif Hussain as Sextus Pompeis plus a good performer clearly shows as to why he was chosen to play this role.

iv – Shabana Hasan played the supporting role superbly. She is a very good and experienced actress that one confidently believes that she would be able to pull off almost any role easily. Other Honorable Mentions: Muhammad Zaman, Faraz Ali, Aisha Iqbal, Tariq Raja and Ishtiaque-ur-Rasool Omar.

v – The costumes of the characters were well displayed.

vi – There were good punch lines by different characters that were spoken time to time in three hours play.

 

+ Low Points

i – The play was so long and boring that I was literally praying for the characters Anthony & Cleopatra to die so that we able to go home.

ii – The art direction of the stage is definitely a low point. Regardless that there was no budget for it, when the play is set to be performed for public including press then such requirement needs to be fulfilled with mild settings to be least. In a three hours play, this would be a huge drawback for the audience.

iii – The war scenes could have been creatively shown by using small hard boards cut pieces of the soldiers, knights … behind a white sheet while their shadows had indicated the war with proper lighting and music. Reference: watch the scenes of war between European and Ottoman army, in the fame horror film ‘Dracula’ (1992).

iv – This play could have improved with a good margin if there was professional music team who were handling the themes accordingly to the scenes and included some vocal songs with related good music.

v – There were way too many characters with hard names to be remembered by the audience.

vi – Performances by other actors were mediocre, especially by Khalid Sherwani and Syed Muhammad Jamil. But it is unfair to blame them as the long play itself was making it almost impossible for anyone to enjoy.

vii – I believe that a three hours play should be edited and make it to two hours one. There were many scenes where hardly gain any interest among the audience, which were making the viewers’ drowsy, in fact some of the people in audience slept unknowingly at their seats.

viii – Almost half of the audience did not return after the interval and further more (at least) 30% people exited the auditorium before the play could be completed. If the play is not interesting and its time length more than two hours, then this would naturally happen. People after the play complained to be ‘Too long’ or ‘Such a drag’.

ix – Rather than translating every word exactly, change some of it by realizing that how would the audience may response after hearing to these words in such an emotional scene. Sometimes it works while most of the times it does not. Instead of taking such a risk, which breaks the tempo and the efforts which are pour in to make those certain scenes with non-humor content then be very careful and wise to which words you exactly chose to speak while delivering it in front of the audience.

 

+ Overall

Sad to say that as stage play, Anthony & Cleopatra is raddled with flaws especially lacking in both image and action.

 

Rate: 2.25 out of 5 stars

 

A review on Pakistani Comic theatre play, ‘Wakeel Sahab’ (2017), The Production Company is Stage Nomad Productions.

 

+ Crew

• Directed by Zeeshan Haider
• Written by Ferenc Mulnar
• Lights & Back Stage by Rao Nauman
• Costume Management by Pervez Ahmed
• Produced by Irfan Anwar

 

+ Note
Wakeel Sahab’s script was originally written in Hungarian. This play has been conducting for several days yet usually performed consecutively late by almost an hour or so.

 

+ Full Cast:

1. Hammad Ather as Phoja Daku
2. Faizan Fazal as Khizer Hayat Qasuri
3. Vania Shakeel as Sultana Begum
4. Wamiq and Qudsi as Policemen
5. Hasan Ali as Principal
6. Ibrahim Noor as Professor
7. Waleed Nasir as Shafi Abbas
8. Yogeshwar Karera as SP Ghazanfar
9. Urooj Advani as Sheha
10. Kulsoom Fatmia as Shakeela
11. Ibrahim Shabbir as Fazlu
12. Rao Jamal Nasir as Rashid Rehman

 

+ Plot
An unusual friendship between the two very contradictory persons that is Phoja Daku and Khizer Hayat Qasuri. It shows how the lawyer’s irrational desire to get famous in the society through any means necessary. Although his wish does get fulfilled but only by getting himself involved in deep jeopardy!

 

+ High Points
i – Eye candy performance by Kulsoom Fatmia as Shakeela. She performed her role with ease and gracefully. Although her character was written weakly but due to her good performance, she was able to make a curious character to watch. The audience would love to watch her performance in other upcoming projects.

ii – Hammad Ather played the main supporting role much better than rest of the cast. His good acting experiences have made the role of Phoja Daku as exciting one. Other Honorable Mentions: Waleed Nasir and Yogeshwar Karera.

iii – Audience might enjoy ‘Wakeel Sahab’ who are new to watching theatre plays.

iv – On some occasions, there were light gags to be entertained such as can not steal chained objects, taking selfies, emotional blackmailing…

 

+ Low Points
i – Same repeated mistakes of trying to make audience laugh by ‘Looking and Acting Funny’. People do not laugh WITH you but AT you.

ii – Amateur Performances by most of the cast members, especially by Vania Shakeel and Rao Jamal Nasir.

iii – In the first forty minutes or so, it was hard to know to what exactly is the main plot? During the time I wondered why the play is named ‘Wakeel Sahab’ if it is keep focusing on the sub plot that is the two different personality guys who are highly interested in the two sisters.

iv – The screenplay was poorly written with outdated jokes and cheesy punch lines.

v – Since I know the director and his work well therefore the level of direction was executed very poorly. For me it is a mystery, whether he really directed this play or only his name was used?

vi – Several flaws of this play made me kept losing interest to watch while making serious efforts not to fall asleep.

vii – Set was terribly designed. There are multiple single doors just besides each one that indicated as though we are looking at public washrooms. On every side of the double window we have vases / lamps kept while over the same window we have painting / photo hanging on the wall.

viii – Lights were too brightly lit for the play, over exposed.

ix – Almost every main character kept talking to themselves (in substitute of voice over) to let audience know what he / she is thinking of.

x – When was the last time a role was written for a female to perform as a strong, independent brave woman who contributes a vital role for a play? However in its place what we (as audience) are usually presented the female characters as ‘Damsel in Distress’ or ‘Love Interests’.

xi – Why would someone make an effort in stretching out his / her leg to intimate with someone if that person is already sitting just next to you?

 

+ Overall
To direct Wakeel Sahab, the director ultimately makes a mockery of himself with forced humor, middling performances and weak screenplay.

 

Rate: 1.25 out of 5 stars