Tele-Films

Mr. Khan’s Review on Zara Si Aurat (1992)

A review on Pakistani classic telefilm, Zara Si Aurat (1992). This telefilm is directed by Sultana Siddiqui and written by Noor ul Huda Shah. Zara Si Aurat was part of the PTV ‘Tele-Theater’ program.

+ Crew

  • Directed by Sultana Siddiqui 
  • Written by Noor ul Huda Shah

+ Note

Zara Si Aurat is a case study of what it means to be a married woman who is torn apart between the wishes of her family and her sense of eternal happiness. Envy and lack of empathy plays an integral role in this melodrama as the protagonist is torn apart between Independence and loyalty to her family.

+ Main Cast

  1. Bushra Ansari as Qudsia 
  2. Shafi Muhammad  as Asad
  3. Behroze Sabzwari as Ahmed

+ Plot

Qudsia (Bushra Ansari) is trapped in the world of endearment. Her task of a model housewife for her husband Asad (Shafi Muhammad) is destroying her career and worse, her sense of happiness. Enter; Qudsia’s cousin Ahmed (Behroze Sabzwari) who makes a surprise visit to her home. As they both feel compatible with each other’s misery, this leads to anger, envy and despair.

+ High Points

i – ‘Zara Si Aurat’ is undoubtedly a daring piece of small screen cinema. The premise of the Tele Theater starts off as a character study but then swiftly turns into a Shakespearean tragedy. The main protagonists of the telefilm mostly play their roles with conviction and a poignant sense of self-realization.

ii – Bushra Ansari has always been an epitome of revolution in Pakistani television. And ‘Zara Si Aurat’ is one of her finest performances on the small screen. 

One of the more memorable dialogue comes early on in the telefilm as Qudsia feels degraded by her husband. She confesses to her friend that she feels like a ‘lesser woman’. A living being without any sense of happiness on the horizon. And hence, comes the title of the Long play.

Qudsia’s character struggles to maintain her identity while being a good wife and a mother. And ultimately, her loyalty leads to her downfall.

iii – Another outstanding performance from the telefilm was from Shafi Muhammad. In all of his previous roles, Shafi has always played the calm, kind hearted man who is empathetic to his fellow man or woman. But not this time. Here, we get to see his sinister side, his pragmatic and contempt for his partner. Shafi Muhammad gives such a unique performance which is a strong departure from all of his previous well renowned roles.

iv – The writer of the telefilm Noor ul Huda Shah did a fantastic job in bringing this story to life. The plot moves at a brisk pace and as the story progresses, the tension becomes more and more intense and with the third act of the telefilm, one is completely engrossed into the narrative of the film.

v – One factor that I always highlight about the Telefilms of the 90s is that they never shy away from powerful endings. And ‘Zara Si Aurat’ is no exception.

+ Low Points

i – Behroze Sabzwari is one of few factors that did not help the telefilm live up to its true potential. This is not a knock against Behroze as an actor but clearly, his performance felt slightly out of place and mildly annoying. So his ‘happy go lucky’ attitude was indeed intentional but a bit of restraint to his performance would have elevated the telefilm towards absolute brilliance. Sadly, his performance did hinder its success.

ii – Of course when it comes to the technical aspects of the telefilm, ‘Zara Si Aurat’ is a victim of its times. The shot composition, the melodramatic music seems bland and ultimately forgettable. The strength of telefilm lies with its premise and brilliant performances from its main cast.

+ Overall

 ‘Zara Si Aurat’ has a fantastic premise and a memorable ending. One of the best telefilms from the 90s era of Pakistani television.

Rate: out of 5 stars 

Tele-Films

Mr. Khan’s Review on Adam, Hawwa aur Shaitan (1994)

A review on Pakistani classic telefilm, Adam, Hawwa aur Shaitaan (1994). This telefilm is directed by M. Zaheer Khan and written by Naheed Akhtar Sultana. Adam, Hawwa aur Shaitaan was part of the ‘Tele-Theater’ program and aired on PTV in 1994.

+ Crew

  • Directed by M. Zaheer Khan
  • Written by Naheed Akhtar Sultana
  • Music by Javed Allah Ditta
  • Cinematography by Asrar Nadim, Muhammad Ijaz, Salman Naji Abdul Mujeeb and Abdul Muhammad

+ Note

In the 1990’s, PTV Tele-Theater was famous for its low budget production but tackled daring societal issues of Pakistan. Adam, Hawwa aur Shaitaan takes its cues (as the name suggests) from the verses of the Holy Quran where Hazrat Adam and Bibi Hawwa were misled by Shaitaan and were then banished by God from Heaven forever. 

 + Main Cast

  1. Shafi Muhammad Shah as Hafeez
  2. Zahin Tahira  as Buwa
  3. Humaira Zaheer   as  Husna
  4. Wakeel Farooqi  as Naseer
  5. Abdullah Kadwani  as Muzammil
  6. Rashida Yaqoob  as Zoni
  7. M.D Gul   as Basheer (Doodh Wala)
  8. Mehmood Ali  as Imam Masjid

+ Plot

Hafeez is a successful Real Estate agent who yearns for romantic fulfillment in his life. After a woman by the name of Husna approaches him for a hand in marriage in order to avoid certain pending problems, Hafeez accepts the offer and it seems like Adam has finally met his Hawwa. Unfortunately, their marriage quickly dissolves into chaos as Husna gets seduced by ‘Shaitan’ who goes by the name of Naseer.

+ High Points

i – Regardless of its low budget, there is a certain charm and a daring sense of realism behind PTV’s Tele-Theater days. And this unfortunately cannot be said for the current TV dramas. The question of infidelity and marital problems create intriguing melodrama for the plot as Hafeez, who is perhaps twice the age of his spouse, cannot keep her content because she yearns for something that he cannot provide. Even though the telefilm takes its time to set up the story and its characters, it does reward its viewers for their patience with excellent performances and wonderful dramatic set pieces.

ii – I’ve always been a fan of Shafi Muhammad Shah. He was unique in his quiet yet stern performances and there has been no other actor in Pakistani television who could ever replicate his talent on screen. His enigmatic and captivating performance as Hafeez is memorable as he pays the ultimate price for his generosity.

iii – The main cast of the show is unique in its characterization and fairly well balanced. Each character’s motivations and desires are well defined to set up the core conflict of the telefilm.

iv – As expected, the story between ‘Adam and Hawwa’ does not end well for either side and once again, just goes to show how bold and fearless the content was on mainstream Pakistani television back then. Admittedly, the production quality was mediocre at best but the writing and performances brought so much to the table. These shows lingered on with you in your thoughts long after the show ended and Adam, Hawwa aur Shaitaan is no exception.

+ Low Points

i – As previously mentioned, the production of the show is obviously bare minimum. There is a single set location of a street which is repeatedly used throughout its runtime, the camera work is unimaginative and there is absolutely nothing that could visually entice you as a viewer. Modern viewers might easily be discouraged due to its slow pacing, darb colors and uninspired visual presentation.

ii – While the characters are all enigmatic, the show does not really allow the viewer to decide who they should root for. Clearly we are led to sympathize with Hafeez who, as a good husband, provides a comfortable life for his wife Husna but in return, she just wants more out of life. It is indeed greed that destroys any chance of happiness for Buwa as she gets seduced by the ‘devil’ Naseer who makes false promises to her and takes advantage of her vulnerability. 

There is some degree of reasoning given for Husna’s erratic, impulsive behavior, hidden in the form of massive age difference between her and the husband but it is not nearly enough to sway the viewers away from understanding Husna’s point of view.

+ Overall

Adam, Hawwa aur Shaitaan is a cautionary tale of Love, Hatred and Innocence. This telefilm is yet another example why the present TV dramas are spineless in comparison to the golden years of Pak television.

Rate: out of 5 stars 

TV series

Mr. Khan’s Review on Aanch (1993)

A review on Pakistani drama TV series, Aanch (1993). The 13 Episode limited TV series is directed by Tariq Jameel and is a PTV Karachi Center production. In 1993, Aanch was broadcasted nationwide on Pakistan Television.

+ Crew

  • Directed by Tariq Jameel 
  • Written by Naheed Sultana Akhtar
  • DOP by Abdul Majib
  • Produced by PTV Karachi Center

+ Note

Aanch is a TV drama which focuses on social issues like divorce and remarriage. It asked vital questions such as “How is a woman viewed by our society if she files for a divorce from her husband?” and “How are children from a previous marriage supposed to be taken care of under such circumstances?”. For its time, Aanch touched upon a subject matter which was widely regarded as taboo from being screened on commercial television. The drama is based on a novel ‘Behtay Paani Pe Makan’ by Naheed Sultana Akhtar who also acted as the writer to the TV adaptation of it.  Aanch is a showcase of patience, perseverance and in the end, triumph of love.

 + Main Cast

  1. Shafi Muhammad Shah as Jalees
  2. Shagufta Ejaz as Khulfat
  3. Sami Saani
  4. Mehak Ali
  5. Shehla Solangi
  6. Ayesha Khan
  7. Mehmood Ali
  8. Qaisar Naqvi
  9. Farheen Nafees 
  10. Kunwar Nafees 

+ Plot

Jalees (Shafi Muhammad) is wealthy businessman who’s wife Asma recently left him and their three children to grasp the opportunity of living abroad. Worried about his children growing up without a mother, Jaless decides to remarry to a working girl named Khulfat (Shagufta Ejaz). Unfortunately things do not go as planned as the step mother and the children have a hard time accepting each other.

+ High Points

i – Aanch is a drama that just gets better with time. Not just episodically but also with the decades that have passed by. Released back in 1993, marriage and divorce were such bold subjects to explore on prime time television. It is somewhat unimaginable how this drama stood out from the rest of the shows on television at the time. And since Naheed Sultana Akhtar also serves as the writer and adapted the screenplay for television, one could just feel how personal the subject matter was to her. I think having a female writer really helped portray a “feminine” perspective to the show. Divorce has a much stronger connotation on a woman than a man and this fact has been on full display and explored on this show. Aanch steps out of the drama world and portrays a more realistic view of how characters would have adjusted in such emotional turmoil. As the name suggests, Aanch has a double meaning in Urdu. One is “feelings of great warmth and intensity” and other “an open flame”. Both when implemented, can easily ignite a happy family within a matter of seconds. And this is what the show represents.

ii – The writing of the show is superb. The emotions and motivations are brilliantly conveyed through spoken dialogues, none of the lines feel forced or out of character. It is, at times, not easy to translate written dialogue to spoken. Sometimes what sounds good on paper does not translate well spoken but Naheed Sultana Akhtar has done an outstanding job in bringing life to her novel onto the small screen. A lot of credit should go to her writing skills for the success of this classic PTV drama.

iii – It probably goes without saying that Shafi Muhammad Shah and Shagufta Ejaz are simply enigmatic whenever they share a scene together. Even with a tightly written script, I personally felt that (at times), the dialogue was improvised between the actors to bring some further “humanity” into the given predicament. Their characters were so utterly convincing at times that as a viewer, it was hard for me to separate the characters from the actors. On one hand, we see the struggle Jalees (Shafi Muhammad) goes through in order to provide his children with a stable upbringing while on the other hand, one could also sympathise with Khulfat (Shagufta Ejaz), who was somewhat forced into this marriage by her family, with children that she has no connection with, the offsprings who just plain refuse to accept her as their new mother. Through their brilliant performances, Shafi Muhammad and Shagufta Ejaz make the conflict clear for the audience to follow and empathise with both sides at the same time. And that is not a small feat to accomplish.

Also I do have to admit that the School of Acting that Rahat Kazmi or Shafi Muhammad Shah came from is unfortunately a lost Art now. Taking nothing away from the actors of today, there was a particular sense of “humanity” that was present in such performances that make these classic dramas so entertaining to revisit time and time again.

iv – Also the supporting cast plays a vital role to the success of the show, particularly Mehmood Ali. His performance really permeates throughout the show as the “voice of reason”. His performance had to be good in order for the show to work and he made every second of the show count.

v– Even the “B story” of the show was interesting and well intertwined with the overall narrative of the show. This is a problem that many episodic TV shows face to balance but Aanch is a textbook example of how it should be handled.

vi– Only 13 Episodes long! A lot of shows have a given quota to prolong the show but Aanch knew the limits of how far the story should be stretched and as a result, the narrative feels tight, responsive and no scene or episode feels dragged or out of place (with exception to one in particular). A lesson MANY television shows of today can learn from.

 + Low Points

i – Although the subject matter and the performances are arguably ahead of its time, the production of the show (unfortunately) is not. Yes, as a reviewer, I should be more forgiving for the TV shows produced in the 90s but some odd production choices did (at times) ruin a dramatic scene which sadly just came off a tad bit comical. Take for example the first episode, there is an intense dramatic scene where Jalees’ first wife is having an argument with him, Jalees blurts out “SHUT UP!”, followed by an exploding (?) building with intense lightning??? Honestly, I just had to laugh at that. Thankfully, this technique was never repeated in the latter episodes. But it is what it is. A product of its time. The camerawork is uninspired, sound is at times muddled, the budget (and the skills behind the camera) were probably not much to brag about. So if you plan on revisiting Aanch (which I wholeheartedly recommend), watch it with an open mind.

ii – The child actors were not particularly good. I’m sure Kunwar Nafees tried his best with what was given to him but none of them felt convincing to the immediate narrative of the show. When you compare their performance to shows like Ankahi (1982) and Faisal Bilal as Jibran, his performance was leaps and bounds ahead. Whenever the scene with child actors came on, I felt being taken out of the show a bit. Unfortunately the director Tariq Jameel is also at fault for not bringing out the best performances from his young actors.

iii – The dialogue is too intermingled with English. On the surface level, I realise that is an odd criticism to make since normally, Pakistanis mix the two languages (Urdu/ English) a lot but sometimes, what works in the real world doesn’t necessarily work on the Television screen. The constant switching of languages (especially by the child actors) was very distracting. A few English words sprinkled in between Urdu sentences is not an issue at all but complete English sentences during Urdu dialogues was very jarring for me as a viewer.

iv – The final episode was basically a clip show from all the previous episodes. Even though I praised the show for being concise with its number of episodes, the clip show just felt like either they ran out of story to tell or they didn’t want to spend money so the creative team decided to rerun their past scenes in between. Either way, the final episode can largely be skipped.

v – SPOILER ALERT!!! (In the next point, I will talk about the ending of the show. You can skip directly to Overall if you would like to avoid it):

For the most part, Aanch has a great balance between the two opposing sides but as the show progresses, the sympathies eagerly lean more towards the husband’s side of the story. In my opinion, both sides were at fault, why did Khulfat have to be the only one to apologize? Just because her husband gave a favorable testimony for her in court, doesn’t automatically clear him off his own mistakes.

Khulfaat was also mistreated by her step children, threatened and verbally abused and the husband did particularly nothing about it. I felt he also needed to step up and apologize for his mistakes of not handling his children well. As the conclusion of the show goes, the idea of the woman not appreciating what she had is prominent much more than the husband who was also at fault.

This conclusion is not bad by any means but it could rub the modern viewers the wrong way and some could even take the wrong “lesson” out of this story.

+ Overall

With such a bold and interesting subject matter to explore, Aanch is a show that was well and truly ahead of its time. Whenever people talk about the “golden days of Pakistani Television”, Aanch is definitely one of the shows that comes to my mind.

 Rate: 3.75 out of 5 stars